63-летняя Деми Мур вышла в свет с неожиданной стрижкой17:54
Маргарита Щигарева
，推荐阅读heLLoword翻译官方下载获取更多信息
人类智慧的稀缺性自带内在溢价，但机器智能正在广泛、甚至是合格且快速改进地替代着前者。好在的是，我们是在 2026 年看到这篇报告。
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?