├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
A small, trusted kernel: a few thousand lines of code that check every step of every proof mechanically. Everything else (the AI, the automation, the human guidance) is outside the trust boundary. Independent reimplementations of that kernel, in different languages (Lean, Rust), serve as cross-checks. You do not need to trust a complex AI or solver; you verify the proof independently with a kernel small enough to audit completely. The verification layer must be separate from the AI that generates the code. In a world where AI writes critical software, the verifier is the last line of defense. If the same vendor provides both the AI and the verification, there is a conflict of interest. Independent verification is not a philosophical preference. It is a security architecture requirement. The platform must be open source and controlled by no single vendor.，详情可参考Safew下载
，推荐阅读爱思助手下载最新版本获取更多信息
I get where Knauss is coming from, and I feel it a too. I love coding! But why bother implementing anything when anyone can make an app in an instant? I’ve been wanting to make upgrades to my online dough calculator but have been putting it off because … well, anyone can just vibe code this themself now.，这一点在体育直播中也有详细论述
My opinion is that what really shapes humans’ identity, and what we crave for is community. Even if we lived in a society where reality is shaped by superintelligent AIs instead of ourselves, we can still be happy. It may hit the ego of many that we are no longer the most intelligent being in the planet, but the same way that a chimpanzee living in the wild can live happily and is not aware of the worries and scares of the stock market and geopolitics, we can live a happy and fulfilling life without worrying about the daily operation of our reality handled by the AIs.